G Writes

I came across a line recently — just a casual post online — and I haven't been able to shake it since. It said: "Georgekutty has become an underrated character just because he is played by Sri Mohanlal." I read it. Scrolled past. Came back. Read it again. And then I sat with it for a long time, because I think it is one of the great observations anyone has made about the Drishyam franchise. Here I am, still thinking about it. We have spent over a decade watching this man — this cable TV operator from a small village, fourth-grade dropout, devoted husband, fiercely loving father — and we have cheered for him. Every. Single. Time. We rooted for him in 2013. We stood up for him in 2021. And now, in 2026, with Drishyam 3 fresh in our hearts, we are doing it all over again. But here is the question I want to sit with today: Who exactly are we cheering for? Let me describe Georgekutty to you — not as the hero the story frames him as, but as who he actually is. He is a man with...

  From unmasking casteism disguised as humor to misogynistic undertones a very disappointing movie with failed attempts at Humor and weak script. Are we still in the 90s?? Family dramas have been a recurring genre in Indian film since its inception, and they frequently uphold patriarchal norms and casteism. Even while there has been improvement in recent years, there are still films that reinforce negative notions. One such film is Madhura Manohara Moham, a Malayalam "romantic family drama" that disappointingly regresses into the problematic patterns of the past.  At first glance, Madhura Manohara Moham appears to mock casteism through humor. However, this facade quickly fades away as the film fails to challenge or condemn the underlying casteist beliefs portrayed by its characters. The story progresses, showcasing characters' blatant casteism and bigotry without any attempt to satirize or critique these harmful ideologies. This omission allows the film to join the ranks ...